AI governance
Decision rights, acceptable use, risk classification, human oversight and accountability across the AI lifecycle.
I work on the governance and operating questions behind AI adoption: accountability, data, security, risk and measurable value.
AI can change decisions, customer experiences and entire operating models. It can also automate weak processes, amplify poor data and create accountability gaps.
Good transformation connects the technology to a clear purpose. Good governance makes the boundaries visible before the organisation scales.
Decision rights, acceptable use, risk classification, human oversight and accountability across the AI lifecycle.
Connecting technology to process, people, operating models and value rather than treating implementation as the outcome.
Protecting sensitive information, controlling access and understanding the data on which AI systems depend.
Testing whether governance works, evidence exists and the organisation can explain consequential AI decisions.
The aim is not to place every experiment inside a heavy approval process. It is to distinguish low-risk use from decisions that affect rights, money, employment, access or safety.
When that distinction is clear, teams can move quickly where they should and apply stronger controls where they must.